Humans have gathered and used plants since the origin of our species some 160,000 years ago. Interaction with plants has been a driving force in hominid evolution for far longer, influencing, among other things, the development of highly dexterous hands and large brains. Learning how plants may be of use to us, locating them in the landscape, tending them and gathering them, and making from them food, tools, clothing, and shelter are all fundamental to being human. It is not much of a stretch, then, to suppose that these activities—which I will group under the term gathering—are human needs, almost as essential as walking, eating, and sleeping. What if there is a kind of innate instinct to gather plants, an ancient urge encoded in our DNA like the honeybee’s quest for nectar from the wildflower?

If such an instinct exists, it would be an atavism—a genetic and behavioral tendency that lays dormant in us, suppressed by a modern society that demands our hands work mostly with machines and our attention focus on flickering screens. When considering what it might mean for humans to call up our plant-gathering instincts, I think of the dog Buck in Jack London’s novel Call of the Wild, a St. Bernard–Scotch collie mix who, when put to the test of survival, reached deep down into his wolf-like primal instincts to survive and thrive in the sub-zero cold of the snowy Klondike Yukon of Canada during the 1890s Gold Rush. By shedding the veneer of civilization, London suggests, Buck became a real dog, the animal he was meant to be.

I argue that in not exercising our innate need to work with plants we are, like Buck during his initial civilized existence, failing to connect with our true natures. This has negative impacts on our physical, emotional, and spiritual well-being. Participating fully in the plant gathering cycle—which includes growing, harvesting, processing, making, and using—asks us to use all our human characteristics together in a way that is more integrated than carrying out the compartmentalized tasks of modern life. It is what our bodies and minds are adapted to and crave. Basketmakers and cloth weavers will affirm this wholeheartedly: practicing their craft brings them balance, meaning, calm, and connectedness.

A key part of gathering plants is how it brings you in touch with natural cycles. Plant reproduction and the ecological renewal of vegetation and ecosystems through disturbance and fire are fundamentally about birth, death, and rebirth. When you tend and gather plants you participate in bringing cycles to completion—not once, but over and over again, ensuring that there is never an end. As a participant in these cycles, you receive feedback about the consequences of your actions—you witness either regeneration or degeneration. In this participant role, there is no room for exploitation or alienation; the obligations of giving back, of reciprocity, erase the gap between culture and nature. Gatherers and makers can thus have relationships with the natural world of sustained, compassionate attention, which the naturalist John Muir Laws has called “a useful definition of love.”

Separated from the possibility of tending, gathering, and using plants the ways our ancestors did, many of us today seek substitutes. One of these substitutes is shopping. Advertising and consumer culture push us toward shopping in ways that have been clearly demonstrated by many writers, but I argue that we are also pulled toward shopping because it superficially resembles plant gathering. We trade the burden baskets of our ancestors for shopping carts. In stores, we gather clothes, shoes, jewelry, household items, foods, gadgets, trinkets, and myriad other items we need and desire. The objects we buy as consumers often fulfill the same functions as those our ancestors made from plants, but they are empty of meaning. No matter how much we buy and consume, we never fill the void left by distancing ourselves from nature and gathering.

For me, shopping never feels very satisfying because I’m not involved in the making of the thing that I’m buying. I am not participating in any part of the cycle of its creation—and in most cases, as exemplified by things made of fossil fuels, there is no cycle, just a one-way chain from raw material to eventual disposal. Being a shopper, I only widen the chasm between my culture and the landscape. I am left fragmented, empty, and always wanting more.

Corporations have, of course, capitalized on our innate need to gather and on the psychological needs left unfulfilled by our distance from the natural world and its cycles. By turning us all into avid shoppers, they have reaped immense profits but also widened the chasm between the user and the gathering landscape and put us on a path that is destroying our planet. Because the things we buy don’t last and are often made with synthetic materials that don’t decompose, they end up in the landfills and pollute our land and oceans. The burning of the fossil fuels to make the energy needed to produce, package, and transport all this stuff fills the atmosphere with gases that are threatening to heat the planet beyond what we can tolerate.

Through years of watching Native women weave baskets, forage, and gather medicines, I’ve come to realize that having a daily relationship with plants—touching, tasting, seeing, smelling, and even talking to them, being grateful for their fragrance, beauty, oxygen production, shapes, and colors—is necessary for sanity. Author and environmentalist Paul Shepard says that our psyches still yearn for contact with “the other” and I would put plants at the top of the list of desired others. The gathering cycle joins us to our ancestors, to our community, to place, to the very plants we are using, and awakens our creativity and awe. It’s no wonder that the word gather derives from an ancient Proto-Indo-European word that means “to unite, assemble, or keep.”

Written with input from, and edited by, Eric Engles.

Photo by Jandy Jones